MONROVIA – The Judiciary of Liberia has strongly denied reports claiming that Chief Justice Yamie Quiqui Gbeisay ordered an investigation into alleged jury tampering in the controversial US$6.2 million corruption case involving former Finance Minister Samuel D. Tweah and other former government officials.
In a statement issued Wednesday, May 13, 2026, and signed by Judiciary Communications Director Caesar Slapeh, the Judiciary described the publication under the headline, “CJ Gbeisay Orders Probe into Alleged Jury Tampering in US$6.2M Corruption Case,” as “false, misleading, and reckless.”
According to the Judiciary, Chief Justice Gbeisay neither authorized nor directed any investigation into alleged jury misconduct or tampering connected to the high-profile corruption trial.
“The story is entirely fabricated and bears absolutely no resemblance to any official action or position of the Judiciary,” the statement emphasized.
Judiciary Clarifies Constitutional Limits
The Judiciary further clarified that Liberia’s constitutional and legal framework does not permit the Chief Justice to arbitrarily interfere in criminal proceedings or independently launch investigations into jury deliberations in matters currently before the courts.
Judicial authorities stressed that such actions would violate the principles of judicial independence and due process established under Liberian law.
“The attempt to attribute such conduct to the Chief Justice is not only legally absurd, but also part of a calculated smear campaign intended to undermine the credibility of the Judiciary,” the statement noted.
The institution warned that misinformation and speculative reporting surrounding high-profile criminal proceedings could erode public trust in Liberia’s justice system and negatively impact democratic governance.
Concerns Over Misinformation
The Judiciary also expressed concern over what it described as the increasing spread of misinformation and unverified claims in politically sensitive cases.
According to the statement, false narratives surrounding ongoing judicial proceedings risk creating unnecessary public confusion and undermining confidence in the courts.
The institution reaffirmed its commitment to the rule of law, judicial independence, and constitutional governance.
It stressed that jury verdicts in Liberia are based strictly on evidence presented during trial proceedings and the applicable law — not on political pressure, media speculation, or conspiracy theories.
“Jury verdicts are grounded in legal procedures and evidence presented before the court, not external influence or political manipulation,” the Judiciary emphasized.
Public Urged to Rely on Official Information
The Judiciary urged the public to disregard the publication and rely solely on verified information disseminated through official judicial channels.
It also warned that it reserves the right to pursue legal action against individuals or entities found responsible for publishing or spreading false and defamatory information intended to damage the reputation of the Judiciary and its officers.
The statement comes amid heightened political and public debate following last week’s mixed verdict in the US$6.2 million Joint Security funds case, which resulted in the acquittal of some former officials and the conviction of others.
The controversial verdict has continued to generate strong reactions across Liberia’s political and legal landscape, with allegations, counterclaims, and legal challenges emerging from both supporters and critics of the court’s decision.
Follow The Liberian Post on Facebook and X (formerly twitter)
