-As Aides Dismiss Claims of Pettiness
MONROVIA, Liberia — A social media controversy over the alleged removal of former Finance and Development Planning Minister Samuel D. Tweah’s portrait from the Ministry of Finance has triggered sharp exchanges online, prompting responses from senior aides of Finance Minister Augustine Kpehe Ngafuan and reopening debate about political decorum between predecessors and incumbents in public office.
The issue gained traction after commentator Philipbert Semogai Browne accused the current leadership of the Ministry of Finance of “pettiness and vindictiveness,” alleging that Tweah’s photograph had been deliberately removed from the gallery of former ministers as a political slight.
However, two aides of Minister Ngafuan — Daniel Nyakonah and Al Hussien Youjay Fadiga — have publicly rejected the accusation, describing it as “picture politics” and a manufactured controversy disconnected from facts.
What the Ministry Says Happened
According to Daniel Nyakonah, when Minister Ngafuan assumed office in September 2024, photographs of both former ministers Samuel D. Tweah and Boima S. Kamara were not hanging in the gallery — not due to removal, but because the frames had fallen from poorly installed fixtures.
Nyakonah disclosed that it was Minister Ngafuan himself who insisted the portraits be restored once the issue came to his attention. He said staff were instructed to replace the photographs within 24 hours, and those who failed to report the fallen frames were reprimanded.
He further questioned why public outrage appeared to focus exclusively on Tweah, while the absence of Kamara’s portrait initially attracted no similar reaction, warning against selective indignation driven by political sympathy rather than institutional fairness.
Fadiga: ‘This Is Not Journalism’
In a separate post, Al Hussien Youjay Fadiga criticized what he described as emotional manipulation and misinformation, arguing that the controversy was being used to recast Tweah as a victim rather than address the substantive legal issues surrounding him.
Fadiga asserted that Tweah is currently facing serious legal scrutiny, including U.S. and Liberian investigations, and that focusing on a fallen picture frame diverts attention from accountability.
“This is not about a portrait,” Fadiga wrote. “It is about avoiding the hard questions.”
Ngafuan’s ‘Unwritten Code’ Resurfaces
The controversy has also revived comments made by Minister Ngafuan on December 20, 2025, when he declined to publicly respond to criticism from former colleagues, citing what he called an “unwritten code of conduct” between incumbents and predecessors.
Ngafuan explained at the time that while he has the capacity to write or speak forcefully, he deliberately avoids public confrontations with former officeholders, preferring private communication and professional restraint.
“I have been a successor and a predecessor,” he said. “I give the benefit of the doubt.”
Observers say this posture helps explain the Ministry’s reluctance to engage directly in social media disputes, even as aides move to clarify factual inaccuracies.
A Broader Question of Political Culture
Analysts note that the episode reflects deeper tensions in Liberia’s political discourse, where symbolic issues often eclipse policy debates, and where social media can amplify minor administrative lapses into national controversies.
The Ministry of Finance has since confirmed that the gallery of former ministers now includes photographs of all past occupants, underscoring its stated commitment to institutional continuity and respect.
As the debate fades, the episode leaves behind a familiar lesson in Liberian politics: that perception can quickly overpower fact — and that leadership style, restraint, and transparency increasingly matter in an era of instant public judgment.
Follow The Liberian Post on Facebook and X (formerly twitter)
